This means meanwhile that standard setting for tranformation from 3dimenzional space
to 4 is n=5 in basic. It is Mitti Innunan's Quantum Solens Transit Theorem which is counting astral
quantum of mass in Sun. m_5 is weight of time (5th)element. Weights of higher elements must
to be appraisal value (for counting more then 3 to 4 dimensions).
To transit sum can I say, that it is counting like product of sum with m and sum, where is
(diference from core)^(n4). I doesn't know more. ;o)
{Secret supplement: With add and nonadd
diference from core to Transit Theorem exists left or right paralel, dipends on whrere we are just now.
In connection of Suns in base of anor(5th dimension) can we with set of half of distance in 3rd quadrat
of Quantum Solens count connection of active Suns of ulterior KanLi Solarsystems in base of denor(6th dimension).
In every cases don't forget that it depend on estimates.} ;o)
Transformation between two mathematical systems is timing in that case, if one mathematical system
is body of "mechanic" (clon firmly connected through computed string to ather system from Transit Theorem
used toward Moon, n=5) in future and second is our mathematical system in past. I don't know why
it is important, but in Transit Theorem is it expressly built to expression 5=0, don't forget.
Pirrate board technic.
For proof mother by Freud like a Sun is
Martin Kreag excursive to artifice: With set in to Transit Theorem
for x=1, m_0=(birth weight), m_1=(today weight) proceed to us transit astral sum of weight of mother Sun
resemble to infinity by limit  so, mother should to blow up more in birth to lots of communication. ;o)
Sacrifice Martin Kreag.
With set in to Transit Theorem for x=0 and m_0=(birth weight) proceed to us astral quantum of marige, which
is approximately same in many cases. We can less count of astral weight through radius of relationship 
how many do we for marige. Philosopher of physics Mitti Innunan.
Meanwhile, when are we thinging about 3 dimensions, so dimension x is only 300 years long (+65y.(+30y.)),
meanwhile strongly unite
mother's casuistic, then it is comming dimensions y and z, which are fully 100,000 years long  unite by life (y) and
control (z). True, for which are we finding, is that dimension x is for prepair only  so are we finding dinosaurs in the
ground, so can we find prestarted dimesion x before 100,000 years to good life. ;o) Cardman Gabriel.
Who knows, knows that time is all dimensions together  not 4th (it's Astral!). Dragon warrior Valas
Theory of Black Holes is nice for problemm of nonexist of Horisont of Events closely before full contraction of space
from view Theory Residual Mass. Just if should mass outside of Horisont of Events limitely closing to zero agains count
of mass inside  Horisont of Events should lost before awaitting Big Bang more (Improove: Schrödinger's balloon in free space must to blow! ;o) ).
C:du warrior or KulVal dog Rachel Valas
... and now  come Hawking: Through Worm's Holes must we find that it dipends on mass in every cases, which is gravitate, and leaving from
its sphere only, where was dilatting space more time! According Theory of Theories is Worm's Hole gravitate through gravity sphere of Sun Assemblage
to middles of our planets, which number is how many dimensions exists (not paralel universes). When is you asking me, what stars are  so they are reflects
of way Worm's Hole from our Sun (south is past, north is future (we getting the cards  isn't it  Leonard?)). Living structures is ratching
time of living in light only.
From this physicits explain of Worm's Hole can we make a phylosoficits explain of time quiz of middle of planets and Sun (where is the watches). At the start
must we comprimate the last theorem to real subjectivity of eye. In this real cannot be life of Sun exlaining by Sun Dwarfs through Einstein Big Bang Theory.
We can talk about so stupid thing like a karma for physicists is. And is it only one thing what defeating Darwin, because lawers "fall" the Sun down
in right time ;o)!
Through Einstein's E can we find that light is time and opposit too. Theorem: For man who has a eyes is clear from where coming light  only to see. 
Question is from where comming the time ;o). I thing that is from middles of planets, becouse Sun is too heavy that it is Black Hole with Horisont of Events
above which can we see our middle  our time.
I accorde  we're alone in Universe, but forwhat more autarchic!
KanLi elchee in Imperium Mitti Innunan by his hand
... and now  come walking God ;o)
I.  For biological computer, which count of nodes is closing limitaly to endless, rules that it is God. 
II.  For node of this biological computer rules that he is follower of AnyEverything. 
III.  For anyeverything of node rules that it is Paying. ;o) 
Hokej playerin Mononoke
So  call  what about dimensions:
Many of physicists means that understanding of dimensions is key to understanding of paralel universes. In my
opinien is writen that is not true. Definition: The thing in some dimension exist, but is not to be seen
(time  [x,y,z] cannot to be aplicated on the thing)!
Mad man somewhere in the Universes
Mechanical potatoe:
Have you ever thought about who ignited the cores of planets? …even though the weight of planets can be spoken about regarding the + spin of the matter. It is the everyone’s beloved dimensional wind that is discharged from the Sun thanks to the gravity of Wormholes  thanks to Sheldon we know that the colapsed matter inside and also !outside! is radiation and, at the same time, it is attracted by planets  i.e. the matter. Yes, my fylology thesis sounds: it ignites radiation  that means colapsed matter  planet from the core to the surface or from the surface to the core. Using a simple analogy we can come to the conclusion that if we want the water to solidify to ice at 0°C and not at 100°C (it is about the spin order  if + or +) that's from the sufrace to the core  which creates gravity i.e. the weight of the matter. In the core of the planet then the dimensions disappear and create timespace [x,y,z], i.e. "the distance that can be seen".
That’s all what’s in the ball. Fylolog The Or
